15 June 2017
Who are the winners and losers?
Michael Reinhard/Corbis/Getty
By Fred Pearce
Dams are supposed to collect water from rivers and
redistribute it to alleviate water shortages, right? Not so fast. It turns out
that in most cases they actually create water scarcity, especially for people
living downstream.
Almost a quarter of the global population experiences
significant decreases in water availability through human interventions on
rivers, says Ted
Veldkamp at Vrije University in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Those
interventions primarily involve dams that take water for irrigation or cities,
or to generate hydroelectricity.
Winners and losers
To investigate the impact of dams on communities, Veldkamp
and her colleagues created a detailed modelling study that divided the world
into 50-kilometre squares. They used this to assess water scarcity between 1971
and 2010, so they could identify the hydrological winners and losers from dam
interventions.
The team found a drastic reshuffling of water-scarcity
hotspots over time, with mostly people upstream benefitting from the capture of
river flows, but those downstream left high and dry.
“Water scarcity is
rapidly increasing in many regions,” says Veldkamp. A recent study put
the number of people living in areas of such scarcity for at least one month a
year at 4 billion. Many blame climate change, but that emerges as only a small
element in the new study.
Shifting resources
Large rivers in which upstream dam activity has led to water
shortages downstream include the Yellow River in arid northern China; the
Ganges, where upstream activity in India has damaged livelihoods in downstream
Bangladesh; the Euphrates, where Turkish dams cause drought in Iraq; and the
Colorado River, where US abstractions leave little water for Mexico.
Richard Taylor, CEO of the UK-based International Hydropower
Association, which represents many dam builders, dismissed the findings.
“The major driver of building a reservoir is to store fresh
water so as to smooth the irregularity of natural flows, absorb floods and
guarantee minimum flows during drought periods,” he says. “These fundamental
services are exclusively downstream benefits.”
Yet the study finds that the worst impacts of dams happen in
months with the highest pressure on water resources. Veldkamp says dams also
increase the average duration of water-scarcity events.
Under pressure
Many nations see dams as an important way to fight climate
change – both by diverting water to alleviate shortages and by generating
low-carbon hydroelectricity to replace power stations that burn fossil fuel.
“In most parts of the world, water storage will be fundamental to the viability
of human livelihoods,” says Taylor.
But Veldkamp’s findings suggest that, whatever the
intention, collecting more water behind dams often aggravates shortages.
Building more dams “might mitigate tomorrow’s climate change impacts for a
certain group of people whilst putting others under pressure today,” she says.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2134785-billion-dollar-dams-are-making-water-shortages-not-solving-them/
SOURCE:
https://opendevelopmentmekong.net/news/billion-dollar-dams-are-making-water-shortages-not-solving-them/
.
SOURCE:
https://opendevelopmentmekong.net/news/billion-dollar-dams-are-making-water-shortages-not-solving-them/
.
No comments:
Post a Comment